🔎︎

[Error: Requires JavaScript.]

Announcements

Work in progress

PK NS 355

Known as:PK NS 355
Cite this page as:Georges-Jean Pinault; Melanie Malzahn (collaborator). "PK NS 355". In A Comprehensive Edition of Tocharian Manuscripts (CEToM). Created and maintained by Melanie Malzahn, Martin Braun, Hannes A. Fellner, and Bernhard Koller. https://cetom.univie.ac.at/?m-pkns355 (accessed 25 May 2024).

Edition

Editor:Georges-Jean Pinault; Melanie Malzahn (collaborator)
Date of online publication:2012-08

Provenience

Main find spot:Duldur-akur
Specific find spot:DA, cour
Expedition code:DA cour
Collection:Bibliothèque nationale de France, fonds Pelliot Koutchéen (Paris)

Language and Script

Language:TB
Linguistic stage:classical
Script:classical

Text contents

Title of the work:Araṇemijātaka
Text genre:Literary
Text subgenre:Jātaka/Avadāna
Verse/Prose:prose; verse

Object

Material: ink on paper
Form:Poṭhī
Size (h × w):7 × 9 cm
Number of lines:4
Interline spacing:1.4 cm

Transliteration

a1/// [a] mma kk(·) p(·) ñ[ā] [pp](·) ///
a2/// mā twe prā [sk]a¯ ¯t || brā hma [ṇ](·) ///
a3/// ṣk(·) e ṅku wa ce ṣa rsa ysā ṣṣe ///
a4/// [kte] yo kasasu [w]e(·) (·)eṃ [a] [mā] [skai] ///
b1/// – – – [ṣṣ](·) [ś](·) (– –) [lyk](·) [śk](·) ///
b2/// ṣa maṃ || tu meṃ br[ā] [hma] ṇi u tta ///
b3/// r[e] ma [ñc]u ṣke e ne rsaka [l](·)(·) ///
b4/// [ce] nä (·)ä rā k[ṣ]a t(·)e ///

Transcription

a1n1 /// ammakk(i) p(o)ñ āpp(ai) ///
a2/// twe prāskatbrāhmaṇ(i) ///
a3n2 /// (mñcu)ṣk(eṃ) eṅku wace ṣarsa ysāṣṣe ///
a4n3 /// (ñä)kte-yokäṃ sÄsuwe(rśk)eṃ amāskai ///
b1n4 /// – – – ṣṣ(e) ś(astärsa) lyk(a)śk(e) ///
b2/// ṣamäṃtumeṃ brāhmaṇi utta(reṃ) ///
b3/// (utta)re mäñcuṣke enersäṅk«†ä» l(kāskemane) ///
b4n5 /// cenä(n)«†ä» rākṣat(s)e(nmeṃ) ///

Translation

a1[Prince Uttara]: “My dear mother! Do tell [my] dear father ..."
a2[The king]: "Do not be afraid!” The Brahmins ...
a3... after grasping (with one hand) the prince (Uttara) [and] with the second hand the golden ...
a4... [my] dear (god)-like son, hard (for me to give away) ...
b1... with the (knife) of ...(I want to smash? the falsehood) into little pieces ...
b2... [The king] sits. Thereupon (dragging the prince) Uttara the Brahmins ...
b3... the prince (Utta)ra l(ooking around) helplessly ...
b4... from these Rākṣasas ...

Other

a4How can I give [away] Uttara, my dear son of divine appearance who is difficult to let go? I do not pay attention to my own sorrow … (cf 240) (Peyrot 2013b: 431)

Commentary

Parallel texts

THT 85, PK NS 699 (?)

Remarks

The paper is severely damaged and the script is partly erased, esp. on the verso. To be judged from the script and the general disposition, this leaf belongs to a different manuscript than the other Araṇemijātaka pieces PK NS 36 and 20, PK NS 35, PK NS 36A and PK NS 699.

Philological commentary

n1Probably the small fragment PK NS 699 b 4 is a parallel, both have ammakki.
n2The Berlin parallel THT 85 a 5 seems to have the more consistent text in accordance with the Vedic ritual of giving water to honor a guest (cf. Mylius 1995: 34 s.v. argha-). Despite the discussion by Couvreur 1964: 240, fn. 13, the notion of "golden water" is not attested in Sanskrit. Therefore, the adjective golden rather is the epithet of the container of the gift water. This, of course, presupposes that here both versions differ. A theoretical possibilty to assume a common text would be to restore to ysā(r)ṣṣe "bloody" (water) – note that THT 85 a 5 can in theory also be read (ys)[ā]rṣṣe –, but this does not make sense here.
n4In contrast to Couvreur, who did not propose any reading for the very damaged first line, based on an autopsy and with the help of the parallel Berlin text THT 85, one can read (and restore) still many signs.

Linguistic commentary

n3The restoration (ñä)kte-yokäṃ is not completely certain but it makes good sense as transposition of Skt. deva-rūpa- "god-like".
n5Couvreur's restoration [ce]nä(n)ä(\) is not warranted, because fremdzeichen 〈na〉 is hardly ever used. Note that in the lacuna of the parallel text THT 85 b 4 there is not enough space for this form cenän, but only for ceṃ from the near-deictic demonstrative se. The use of the recognitional pronoun seṃ makes more sense in this context.

References

other

Couvreur 1964: 239-240

Translations

Peyrot 2013b: a1 (305), a4 (302, 431), a4 (431), b4 (363)

Bibliography

Couvreur 1964

Couvreur, Walter. 1964. “Nieuwe Koetsjische fragmenten van het Araṇemijātaka.” Orientalia Gandensia 1: 237–249 + I.

Mylius 1995

Mylius, Klaus. 1995. Wörterbuch des altindischen Rituals. Wichtrach: Inst. f. Indologie.

Peyrot 2013b

Peyrot, Michaël. 2013b. The Tocharian subjunctive. A study in syntax and verbal stem formation. Vol. 8. Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics. Leiden/Boston: Brill.